Probably, there is not a person left who is not interested in the work of ChatGPT. In general, most of us interact with artificial intelligence (AI) every day, often without even realizing it. It selects videos, music, movies for us, finds our friends in social networks, helps to process photos, etc. But how useful is ChatGPT in matters involving whistleblowers?
The following story proves that AI misinterprets this concept and turns whistleblowers into criminals. Brian Hood is a whistleblower who has been honored for his "extraordinary courage" when he helped expose a global bribery scandal involving the National Reserve Bank of Australia. But ChatGPT thinks otherwise.
Instead of emphasizing Hood's significant role in exposing the scheme, ChatGPT falsely claims that Hood himself was indicted of bribing foreign officials, pleaded guilty to bribery and corruption, and was convicted.
When Hood found out, he was shocked and said he planned to sue the company that owns ChatGPT for spreading false information about him through the chat. This could be the first AI-generated defamation lawsuit.
Full description of the story at the link: https://bit.ly/3AKZy0s
We believe that AI can be a tool that can be used to make any job easier, but all the information you generate through AI needs to be checked and filtered. And the main thing is to prescribe the technical task in detail and qualitatively and check the sources.
